54-ANS

If we study group behavior among our chimpanzee cousins, and if we accept the fact we were exactly like them prior to our breaking the time barrier, we can learn a lot about ourselves. In the wild, alpha males dominate physically in a altruistic way. They play an important role in the survival of the specie by spreading the best available genes while protecting the females and their offspring. But it’s the wily alpha females who most often lead the group to food sources and water holes and teach the extended family members the necessary survival skills.

Since becoming intelligent some three million years ago, the female’s role has changed, but genetically, she hasn’t. She is as invaluable as she ever was to the specie, but it seems that the opinion she has of herself has seriously deteriorated, and we should want to remedy that. To my way of thinking, when explaining the injustices done to the female, the three main culprits have to do with our breaking the time barrier, with her reproduction lifespan, and the Christian Church’s perennial attitude towards her gender.

We have already seen in a previous posting how unkind nature was to women, how after breaking the time barrier and leaving the world of natural selection, the males dominated them more than ever. But before I attempt to show how her reproduction lifespan and Christianity dampened her aspirations for freedom and equality, I think it would be helpful to better understand our ANS.

All vertebrates have a reptilian brain sitting atop the spinal cord consisting mainly of the hypothalamus which links the endocrine and nervous systems. It’s where the autonomous nervous system (ANS) control center that regulates, without our conscious intervention, bodily functions such as heart rate, digestion, respiratory rate, pupillary response, urination, defecation, and sexual arousal is located. If we want to focus on our human values and eventually establish parity between the sexes, we have to become more familiar with that primitive brain that can only be synced up with our human brain if we intervene consciously.

When the dinosaurs disappeared some 65 million years ago, we were small burrowing mammals and we lived by our fight-or-flight and feed-or-breed instincts. Danger was everywhere, in our burrows and in the sky above, and the constant stress we experienced was such that we didn’t live much longer than rodents do today. However, as our brain developed, we learned to sort things out, and as our daily survival stress was reduced, we grew and lived longer. We acquired a limbic brain, then a cortex and neocortex grafted themselves onto the limbic brain, and as little as 3 million years ago, standing on our own two feet, we had the wherewithal to break the time barrier as explained in an earlier posting. Though we were no longer subjected to the forces of ‘natural selection’ and ‘survival of the fittest’, we still answered to those forces, and we still do to this day.

Upon becoming intelligent, we did, however, learn to live in sync with some aspects of our ANS. However, we never learned to deal efficiently with our sex drive. Having become aware of the exquisite and gratuitous pleasure that an orgasm procures, and with ever more time on our hands, when we became aroused sexually, we just didn’t try very hard to put on the brakes. Nonetheless, right up to the 20th century, we depended on the family for survival, and because we didn’t want to be shunned by it, we felt obliged to use some degree of self-discipline in controlling our sexual urges. But when societal empowerment took hold in the 20th century, fashion ads, social media, celebrity lifestyles and Hollywood films seriously encouraged us to adopt lascivious and superficial behaviors. We still followed the group, but the group had become virtual and individuals related to each other through their libido, and most often, virtually.

We can’t escape the fact that sex is forced upon us by our ANS, that it procures us intense pleasure and that we have no choice but to reproduce as a specie. It is all the more reason to be aware of this archaic breed-or-feed instinct that’s taking over our lives, and to establish education programs to help us channel it. Sex is a lot of fun and indispensable, but we have to put it in its proper place by using the brain we acquired as humans. Why do teachers, mothers and fathers have so much trouble explaining sex to children?

Ask any 10-year-old child what he or she thinks about dad sticking his penis into mom in order to make a baby, and he will quickly respond by saying that it’s gross. Perhaps that may be the reason untold generations have refused to talk openly about sex with children, but perhaps it’s simply because adults unwittingly want to cover up the fact that they think the act of penetrating another’s body is vulgar and demeaning. Sticking a penis or a tongue in the vagina, the anus or the mouth of another isn’t esthetic. Hollywood, the media, and even the Christian Church make it sound attractive or at least acceptable for their own purposes, and because we’re intelligent monkeys and don’t want to be labeled prudish, we adopt and even defend those view points. The end result is that though the ugliness of the act makes us uncomfortable, we act as though it’s cool. The only time we are totally in tune with our sex drive is when we’re sexually aroused, a time when we are forced to blindly answer nature’s call.

For the most part, horniness is brought on independently of our will, and when men are in that state, they may even go so far as to kill someone who stands in the way of their penetrating the targeted body and injecting their semen. And women also display despicable behaviors when in estrus and determined to get a man. So, how can we explain such behavior except to say that it’s our ANS that’s forcing us to reproduce. If we sometimes go completely out of control and adopt horrid behaviors in order to comply with that imposition, who’s to blame? Traditionally, the Cristian Church has tried to control sexual behavior by insisting on no sex before marriage, pretending sex is love, dressing it up socially, and using the condemning-confessing-repenting-forgiving solution, but those are all band-aid approaches. We would be much better off if we faced the problem head on in a scientific and objective manner through education. That way, we could deal with sex like we deal with food. A shared meal prepared with patience and with tasty natural ingredients is more rewarding than stuffing one’s face with a bag of chips on the run.

In spite of the sexual act being ugly, we have to admit that some courtship displays preceding it are breathtakingly beautiful. When we write love poems, slow dance, walk hand in hand, whisper sweet nothings to each other, hug and look at each other languorously, what could be more beautiful? And later, is it necessary to mention the boundless joy felt when a newborn comes into the world? But the middle game where one’s body penetrates or is penetrated by another is ugly, no matter what the fashion magazines or Hollywood tell us, show us, or imply regarding the matter. Observing someone penetrate the mouth, the anus or the vagina of another with his body parts is no prettier than observing the ejection of urine, excrement or vomit by these same orifices.

Nonetheless, excluding our sex drive, we did learn over time to deal with some of the ANS impositions that affect our daily lives. The use of knives and forks is today common, and we no longer act like pigs when we eat. And what about toilets and bathrooms that made urination and defecation banal a mere century ago? Nonetheless, we definitely haven’t learned to deal with fornication where a partner is indispensable. We willingly give in to it if we’re horny, drunk or drugged, that is, when we don’t have to think about it, but because we still refuse to face the issue in a rational manner, we continue to make a mess of it. For centuries, thanks in part to the sacrament of matrimony instituted by the Christian Church, we have amalgamated the words sex and love in order to deal with the grossness of the sexual act being forced upon us. And if we’re not sure of how we feel about the sexual act, all we have to do is picture the next-door neighbor copulating with his wife, and that should give us the answer.

53-BADGE OF FEMININITY

Before breaking the time-barrier and becoming intelligent, that is, in the pre-sapiens era, all women got the services of an alpha male who fought for that right. Sexually, the females were all fulfilled while most of the males were frustrated. But after we left the world of natural selection, women experienced a total reversal of fortune. That’s when the males found ways of outwitting the alpha male and started forcing themselves on the physically weaker females. To make matters worse, males not only associated sex with pleasure, but they also wanted as many healthy male offspring as possible in order to help them hunt and fight off their rivals. Moreover, as natural selection waned, the genetic pool deteriorated. The males became more selective and preferred females endowed with good childbearing attributes, that is, young with big bosom and generous hips. When all is said and done, the day we broke the time barrier some three million years ago, it was not a good day for the females.

Women never had a chance to fight back until the great wonderful world of credit got rolling in the early part of the 20th century. That’s when they started moving to the cities and working in factories and offices. They earned pitiful wages, often pinched by their fathers, but they still managed to put the odd nickel away in order to buy silk stockings or a coveted tube of lipstick. They felt that if they painted up to look young and beautiful like the kept women depicted in paintings hanging on museum walls, or the public sexy women in Hollywood films, they would have a better chance of getting an alpha male like they were genetically programmed to have. In spite of the fact they were using a vulgar, unnatural and hopeless approach, there was hardly a female who didn’t adopt the badge of femininity.

The badge of femininity consists of wearing lipstick and mascara, showing cleavage and enhancing the buttocks with the help of high heels. It is perceived as a badge of independence and freedom, and because we are 100% animal of the ape family, the females, young and old, can’t wait to wear it and be like everybody else. Today, when a woman walks into her workplace without her badge, she is often challenged by the other females and accused of being slovenly. It’s a form of competition. If the women with less sex appeal force the pretty foxy ones to paint up like they themselves do, the physical differences between them will be less noticeable. But it gets worse. Males also get involved in this competition because they too are apes. Men despise makeup for the most part, but if females make a point of wearing the badge of femininity, they want the one who has the most attractive one. Her badge becomes his badge. Makeup is ludicrous to the point where women don’t want to be seen not wearing any by their mates when they go to bed at night, and make sure they have it on before their mates see them in the morning. The bottom line is, who, at the personal level, be they husbands or children, can feel fuzzy-wuzzy towards a woman wearing a mask, and in the workplace, take a made-up clown or a bimbo seriously. Women must reclaim their natural look, walk with their head held high, and find a real mate who loves them for who and what they are. That will not happen if they make a point of wearing the badge 24/7.

Women want parity, and it’s totally warranted, but how can it be achieved? Let’s say an employer wants to hire an accountant. The first candidate is a female wearing the badge of femininity, the second is a male wearing tight pants and displaying a hairy chest, and the third one is a nondescript male wearing a suit. Assuming they are all equally qualified, the first one will be hired if the employer wants to decorate the office, the second will be hired if he happens to like pretty boys, but the third will be hired strictly because he’s an accountant. To be sure, there are situations where men and women are not meant to compete, but in our world of robotics and AI, women definitely can compete in most areas without having to look like clowns or playing the role of bimbos.

Many would dearly like to help women achieve parity and have them take their rightful place, for it would make for a better world. Needless to say, if we lived in a matriarchate like elephants do, or returned to the world of our wild cousins, the problem wouldn’t exist. But that’s not the case, and the problem at hand is to find a way to reverse the perceived need to wear the badge of femininity. Maybe doing things like legislating against beauty contests for little girls would be a start. Who remembers JonBenet Ramsey, the six-year-old pageant winner who was found strangled in the basement of her house. What about the ‘glitz pageants’ where prepubescent bodies wear hair extensions, heavy makeup, press-on nails, and high heeled shoes. The enhancements are not only encouraged, they are necessary to win. Judges will even deduct points for contestants who don’t wear teeth covers that hide their jack-o-lantern smiles. Many good Christian women don’t see anything wrong turning their 6-year-old daughter into a sex object. If the ordinary mother remains undecided, she should ask herself why she doesn’t allow her 10-year-old daughter to wear make-up. If she ponders over the matter, she will soon realize that all females should do away with the badge of femininity.

Nonetheless, there is hope in that a growing number of women, who have reached their rightful place in the scientific, academic and medical fields, refuse to wear the badge of femininity. It seems that education is the key to the true emancipation of women. We can never go back to the world of natural selection where genuine alphas do what’s best for the group. So, women have to learn to find a mate on the basis of honesty, trust and compatibility, and they can’t do that unless they discard their badge of femininity and show their true self.

Since women are the main victims of the ongoing twisted sexual revolution, they are more apt to want to initiate change, and if change is to occur, educating young girls is the best way to get started. If girls are made fully aware that we are no longer part of the world of natural selection, if they understand their ANS (future posting), and if they know how this great wonderful world of credit was created, they’ll naturally want to take advantage of it by establishing lasting relationships based on basic human values, and the boys will have no choice but to follow.

 

 

P.S.

 

Women wear the badge because they don’t like their self image for whatever reasons, and the badge makes them feel pretty and feminine. Since they aspire to be like everyone else, and since wearing the badge is an accepted world-wide calamity, they just wear it without thinking how vulgar and unnatural it is. As we go forward in this consumer world, the more stupid and phoney we become. The women don’t even know that they wear the badge in order to get a pseudo male alpha just like the public and kept women of the world that she sees on museum walls and the big screen seem to get. Since all perceived successful seductresses wear the badge, why not her?

On the other hand, males don’t mind looking at racoon-eyed ladies with fellatio-inviting lips who let their boobs hang out while jacking up their butts with high heels, and they’ll diddle them every chance they get. They are not too fond of all that messy stuff they wear, but since most girls wear make-up, they just try to get the most striking one, mostly to impress their buddies. If a girl wears the badge, they know she’s sexually alert and won’t undermine their male ego. But if they see one without the badge, they just know she’s a ball-breaker and steer clear. Males will take the path of least resistance every chance they get, being quite content just to have a sexual relationship. So why do women keep wanting to be ugly and phoney bimbos and keep insisting on playing on this uneven playing field, when being natural offers such great advantages. Bimboism and parity are definitely incompatible.

 

52-THE PILL

Self-empowerment is the greatest feeling one can experience. As a child, when I saw my uncle observe his field of golden wheat swaying in the sun before bringing in the crop, I saw a fulfilled man. In winter, when, in the warm presence of his expanding family, he sat around the dinner table where the products of the farm were being served, he was a happy man. Those feelings have nothing to do with societal empowerment. Societal empowerment has turned out to be very detrimental to human development in that it supplanted self-empowerment. The conundrum is that while societal empowerment should give us greater access to self-empowerment, it does just the opposite.

When the world of credit got rolling in early 20th century, women were the first victims of societal empowerment. Because they had always been subjected to male domination, they were understandably overwhelmed by the world of credit and the power it offered them. Unfortunately, not knowing what to do, they decided to get emancipated through the man. In order to get ahead, it was easier to seduce a pseudo alpha male who would do everything for them instead of looking for a genuine life partner who was their equal. Thus, the badge of femininity became the symbol of the sexual revolution that we’re still experiencing today, and it does not favor parity. What follows is an attempt at explaining the mess brought on by societal empowerment.

In early 20th century, people moved to the cities in tandem with the arrival of electricity, tap water, toilets and jobs. It was the beginning of tangible societal empowerment. In 1913, the bankers in the City created the US Federal Reserve Board, which made the dollar an international currency, and America, the biggest economy on earth. With this great market economy firmly in hand, the City could now proceed with its globalization agenda. It was time to bulldoze the Ancien Regime countries of the world, including those of the Holy Roman Empire in Europe, Tsarist Russia, the Ottoman Empire, Japan and China. Although the two World Wars that followed created havoc in the existing market economies, the result was mostly positive, for the women finally got good paying jobs. After WWII, America now being considered an Eldorado, all the citizens of the world wanted to go there in order to create wealth, and a lot was created in a very short period of time.

People experienced greater comforts and long-term prospects looked good. However, as societal empowerment took root, it was the males who got the diplomas, the managerial responsibilities, and the investing and inventing opportunities. Males were cast in the ‘father knows best’ role, and that didn’t augur well for the females. Although some women got good paying jobs, most were of the office secretarial staff and factory production line variety. The parents wanted their sons to have a good education, get a good job, make good money, and marry a good woman, while for the daughters, it sufficed to get a good man, a ‘somebody’. The world continued to be very macho because women’s ambitions were geared to that of their men.

However, in 1920, after the passing of the 19th amendment, women got the right to vote, own property, and manage their bank account without their husband’s permission. After WWII, there was a move to the suburbs and the good life, and that’s when the real trouble started. It was the beginning of a world of comfort, leisure and plenty, a world for which our specie is absolutely not genetically programmed. The desperate housewife was being born.

However, women had to wait for the 1960’s and the advent of the pill in order to be emancipated, at least sexually. That’s when they were freed to some extent from male sexual domination and abuse. For the first time in 3 million years they could claim that they were in charge of their own body, and free to decide whether to have children or not. But though the females did gain some sexual freedom, social parity remained very much out of reach.

Genetically, women are programmed to get the best male with the best genes, as dictated by natural selection. But when we became intelligent and left the world of natural selection some three million years ago, though our genetic make-up remained unchanged, the relationship between males and females took an abrupt turn for the worse. Women lost their privileged status in that they stopped getting the services of the best genitor available, the alpha male. Not only did more lower ranking males get at the females, but they became selective as well. At the first opportunity, that is, when the pill came along, women unwittingly attempted to go back to the good old natural selection days where they were the ones who more or less chose and got the best genitor. But unfortunately, in trying to reclaim their social role of old, they decided to do so by being seductive. They didn’t know at the time that fighting for emancipation by attracting pseudo alpha males with their badge of femininity would not only be a missed opportunity, but a disastrous social experiment. They didn’t know that the altruistic alpha male of pre-sapiens times no longer existed.

The male entrepreneurs were quick to exploit that sexual aberration by taking charge of the fashion world. The badge of femininity, as a symbol of independence and success, was adopted with a vengeance when technicolor first hit the big screen in 1936 and especially the small screen in 1966. In the process, women naturally morphed into Barbies, and it made many heterosexual and homosexual males of the fashion and cosmetic world very rich. By wearing her mask, the female couldn’t hope to find a partner who was her equal and a job worthy of her potential, and she was an easy prey for any pseudo alpha male who came along. Establishing a meaningful equal relationship became almost an impossibility. The female certainly wasn’t aware that wearing the badge in order to get a man was not only ugly and vulgar, but counterproductive as well. To be fair, the pill had hit the market like a tsunami, and overwhelmed, women had responded instinctively by looking for an alpha male like they had always had in the world of natural selection millions of years before. Unfortunately, they weren’t aware that the alpha male of old had volatized along with the world of natural selection and had been replaced by self-interested and self-centered imitations.

It now seems obvious that if women are to achieve social equality and parity, they must discard the badge of femininity as an absolute prerequisite. They not only have to fight tooth and nail for equal education and equal jobs for equal pay, but they have to focus on getting free universal child care, parental leave, and having access to pro-choice clinics. Women would be well advised to stop making their quest for alpha males a top priority, for altruistic alpha males are long gone. The alpha male of old was objective in his role, and was concerned with the welfare of the group, whereas today, the perceived alpha male is mainly self-interested. The female should look for an ordinary loving man like her in order to share the joys of family life on an equal footing instead of looking for a pseudo-alpha dominating male, be he an Adonis.

But in our world of leisure, it’s hard to find a partner with whom we can establish a lifelong relationship based on trust, honesty, and respect. And if equality and parity are to be achieved, women have to stop using sexuality as a tool, and throw their badge of femininity in the trash can. If one feels the need to prove that he or she is a man or a woman, something has to be terribly flawed in the party in question. Marlboro Man, the macho man par excellence, was dethroned years back, surely Barbie, the bimbo, can be as well.

51-EMPOWERMENT

Hopefully, my blog has so far succeeded in convincing readers that we live in the best of all possible worlds, that there will never be another world war, and that the final obstacle to globalization, the oil patch unrest, will soon become a figment of our collective memory. We have Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the greatest man who ever lived to thank for that. Yes, we are in safe hands and free to enjoy a great quality of life like at no other time in human history. This is true in spite of the fact that the Gorgon Sisters brandish the crop more than ever, in wanting to make us believe just the opposite in order to keep us in line. They have no choice, for during the time the dynasty of bankers in the City have had full control of world finance, that is from 1913 to today, world population went from 1 to almost 8 billion. And because the world of credit spawned a world of leisure, the Gorgon Sisters are solicited more than ever. It’s more proof that our world is financially controlled by Mayer’s dynasty. If we are persuaded that it’s indeed the case, we have to also believe that the City is prepared to defend its great creation with tooth and nail. I personally want everybody to believe that what is best for the dynasty of bankers in the City is what is best for us all, and if I succeed, we will all lead less stressful lives and feel less the need to be superficial.
We are unfortunately overwhelmed by societal empowerment, an illusion of personal power that evolved as jobs were created in early 20th century. That’s when we started putting money in our pockets and thus had access to credit for the very first time. Mayer Amschel Rothschild, a great family man who was born in a ghetto in Frankfurt, in 1744, where he lived all his life in complete anonymity, most certainly didn’t foresee this outcome. His main concern was empowering individuals by giving them access to credit and a decent life, not making them victims of societal empowerment. If we believed what his dynasty stands for, we would be more inclined to adopt the values that make us happy, what makes all living beings happy, that is creating an enduring family and earning a living using our natural talents. Life was in a way simpler when we foraged for food and water around the clock, for we had no time to think, but in a world where food and water are available in abundance, not to mention credit, we have to think about what makes us happy if we want to be happy. We must stop thinking short term like we are genetically programmed to do.
Regardless, whether we believe in the existence of Mayer’s dynasty or not, we can’t deny that in the last 100 years, humans have been seriously empowered as a specie. Democracy, or the world of credit as I call it, is the greatest gift mankind ever received. This ultimate political system made credit available to the lowest rungs of society. Mayer and his banking dynasty gave mankind the means to know freedom, security, prosperity and leisure beyond belief. Unfortunately, we have stopped being self-empowered in the process, the root cause being that we live in a world of leisure for which we are not genetically programmed, a world that tears us away from family, fauna and flora.
Democracy, or access to credit, has turned out to be a double-edged sword. In the last hundred years, the fantastic societal empowerment that it provided mankind has almost completely supplanted self-empowerment. As we moved from the country to the city, we started disconnecting from the natural world and became intoxicated with societal empowerment to the point where we ignore our true nature. We want a bigger salary, a bigger house, bigger car, and more of everything instead of wanting what makes us happy. Our libido drives us and we are totally preoccupied by wanting others to see us as sexy, smart, important, young, rich, and beautiful beings, all the while harboring a poor self-image.
The world of credit as we know it today was created in 1810, in the City, but as far as we mere mortals are concerned, it only got going in early 20th century when electricity and the FED came along. When television followed, series like ‘Little house on the prairie’ portrayed what self-empowerment was all about. Bringing in a crop, raising healthy farm animals, feeding the family, and building a homestead for sheltering a family and welcoming friends and neighbours were fulfilling activities. Our ancestors worried at times, but it never constituted stress, that is, the permanent nebulous state of anxiety many of us experience today.
Societal empowerment actually started in 325 CE when the newly entrenched and official Roman state religion, the Christian religion, gained political control of the Western Roman Empire and invaded it like a hermit crab. Gradually, the Church’s anointed absolute kings of divine right ruled over Europe, forcing the Nicene Creed down everybody’s throat and committing mindboggling atrocities in the process. In spite of all that, common man was valorized and socially empowered for the first time. Christians were told they were created in the image of God and went to heaven if they obeyed the 10 Commandments. If they didn’t, they ended up in burning hell for eternity, it was up to them. Unfortunately, or more exactly, fortunately, because the Holy See and its Kings of Divine Right were so intolerant and nearsighted, they made two deadly enemies, the Jews and the Huguenots (French Protestants).
These two persecuted groups managed to join forces in Amsterdam in 1602 before moving to the City, in London, in 1688, where they established the world’s first democracy. But it was a limited democracy in that only English merchants and privileged citizens voted and had access to credit. It was only when Nathan Mayer Rothschild took over the Bank of England in 1815 that access to credit started being available to ordinary citizens. In early 20th century, with electric power being made available to all and Mayer’s dynasty having created the FED, the consumer world went into high gear. Since then, world population went from 1 to almost 8 billion. Today, just about everybody earns a salary which means having access to credit. Paradoxically, the more people have the wherewithal to do what makes them happy, the more stressed they become.
Like Christianity, Democracy has always been romanticized, and most of us don’t know how they were created in 325 CE and 1689 CE respectively, and that’s part of our problem. If we accept the fact that intelligence is a consequence of our breaking the time barrier, and that the more we are able to connect with the past in order to learn from it and make for a better future, the more intelligent we are, we must conclude that we are going backwards. Most of us live in the present and let our minds drift in historical amnesia, forever demanding to be fed more societal empowerment junk by the Gorgon Sisters via our smartphones. Instead of trying to understand how Christianity and Democracy were created and what our real values are, we whirl around brightly lit smartphones just like moths around light bulbs, forever risking getting our wings singed.
Self-empowerment has to do with basic human values, whereas societal empowerment has to do with doing as the group does. While basic human values are those of all living things and are fulfilling, societal values are moral in nature and are simply meant to make the group function. The secret would be to learn to live with the smartphone while identifying and giving top priority to our basic human values. We’re not genetically programmed for a world of comfort and leisure, and since we still march to the beat of ‘survival of the fittest’, we always want more, bigger, better and so on, while neglecting the essentials of a happy life. Family life, flora and fauna are taken for granted, and we fail to give priority to our natural talents, and hence to live by them.
When we were little burrowing animals, around 65 million years ago, we were constantly wary of the dangers in and around our burrow and in the sky above. We grabbed any food at hand and reproduced using the wham-bam thank you ma’am method. We were constantly on the alert and permanently stressed. Today, we feel threatened by the real or perceived threats of the whole world, we grab junk food on the go, and we use the wham-bam thank you ma’am approach to sex more than ever. Are we going backwards?
All living beings on earth are beautiful and fulfilled when they are in a nurturing or creative mode, so that’s what we should strive for if we want to free ourselves from stress. Creating a solid and lasting family group and using our true talents in order to earn a living, should definitely be our main aspirations. In the last 100 years, the City bankers have created an environment that allows us to easily do just that, yet our primal instincts make us do the exact opposite, the too many divorces that produce hordes of emotionally crippled children and the ongoing battle for higher paying jobs being sufficient proof.
The 20th century has afforded us great freedoms and comforts, but that’s turned out not to be such a good thing because it’s not in sync with our genetic makeup. In the last centuries, we may have learned to eat and drink properly and dispose of our body waste, but we haven’t learned to reproduce properly because it’s deemed to be a lowly animal thing that we, as intelligent beings, find quite vulgar and demeaning unless we’re sexually aroused. Nonetheless, we are 100% animal of the ape family and we must answer to our ANS or we don’t survive, so we better wake up and accept those facts, for only then will we start dealing properly with our libido. Because we now live in a world of leisure, our libido drives us more than ever, yet instead of teaching our kids how their libido will soon force them to make babies and preparing them to face up to their responsibilities when they become teens, we, as well as society at large, pussyfoot around the subject at best. If the teen is aware that his libido is a ‘natural selection’ tool meant to force him to make babies and if he is aware what that involves from A to Z, he’ll be more apt to behave responsibly, and who knows, maybe choose self-empowerment as exemplified by a Charles Ingalls over societal empowerment typified by a Donald Trump.
There is a trick on how to wean ourselves from societal empowerment. First, we must accept that R&D (research and development) started being financed in a systematic way when the Huguenots and the Sephardim created the Bank of England in 1694 and that the financing of R&D became international when Mayer Amschel Rothschild and his son Nathan took over the Bank of England in 1810. Since then, every major project in the world must be financed, thus okayed, by that dynasty in order to be realized. That dynasty gave birth to democracy as we know it today, and if we believe that, we are half-way there. The hard part for us is to believe that we are the benefiters not the initiators of that wondrous credit system. Every time we take a shower, turn on the lights or use our GPS we should thank that dynasty. The bankers in the City are the ones who decide to finance a Hubble or a Panama Canal, all we do is pay to use it. We of course pay taxes and user fees when using the Channel Tunnel, the Internet or our smartphone, but we should be very happy to do so. The secret to becoming serene and enjoying this great world of credit is to believe what has just been said. If we can muster enough humility in the process, we can reclaim our self-empowerment status. ‘Think positive’ should be replaced by ‘think talent’, no matter how modest our talents are.

50-THE OIL PATCH

Our consumer world is built in large part on oil. The sweetest and cheapest oil comes from the Middle East. Today, the unrest we see in the world and call terrorism stems in large part from its exploitation, and it constitutes a major obstacle standing in the way of the development of the global village. But although the oil sheiks have accumulated mountains of petrodollars, they have no real power, so it won’t take as long for Islam to throw in the towel as it did for the Holy Roman Empire.

Because the oil sheiks are bitter relative to the apparent injustices done them by the City bankers, and because they don’t want to be overwhelmed by western ways, they manipulate Islam in order to reclaim some power over their destinies. Religion is once more being used as a tool. However, because the City has all the gold and controls all the central banks of the world since the Bretton Woods agreement in 1944, it is omnipotent, and it will not let the oil sheiks stop the march of globalization.

The Middle East problem started after the fall of the Ottoman Empire during World War I, when a Briton, Mark Sykes, and a Frenchman, Francois Picot, were directed to draw the new borders of the Middle East sheikdoms. In wanting to better organize the exploitation of oil by France and Britain, the City bankers directed them to draw the map of this very volatile region of the world and divide it into states that cut through ethnic and religious communities. In doing so, they created a geopolitical problem of great proportion. A century on, many Arabs continue to blame the subsequent violence in the Middle East, from the occupation of Palestine to the rise of the Islamic State, on the Sykes-Picot treaty.

The excellent cheap easily extracted oil started being shipped around the world just as the US Dollar was becoming the dominant currency in the world following the creation of the Federal Reserve Board in 1913. At that time, oil was selling for less than five dollars a barrel, and Europe and America couldn’t get enough of it.

For 100 years now, the Arab states, led by Saudi Arabia, have been selling mindboggling amounts of oil to the developed countries. To this day, the Emirates hold more dollars than anybody else in the world, and therein lies the problem. They can build ski slopes in the desert, but they are not allowed to build aircraft carriers and atomic bombs. The only way the oil sheiks can make the petrodollars work is by depositing them in the Central Banks of the World which are directly tied to the City. If they wanted to withdraw their dollars in order to make the Central Banks collapse, their dollars would no longer be worth anything. It is the best catch22 ever devised. The sheiks are very rich, have little power, and are very frustrated.

Terrorism is the result of this frustration. The Emirates are doing everything they can to reclaim their autonomy and free themselves from the City. Though this is an absolute impossibility given that the City owns and runs the financial world, it does not stop them from trying. The sheiks have not only chosen to manipulate Islam in order to achieve their goals, but the problem is further complicated in that Islam is split into Sunnis and Shiites, two factions that behave like deadly enemies.

Following the Sykes-Picot treaty in 1916, the City not only financed the development of the oil industry, but they paid for the oil extracted. The problem, however, was that the sheiks didn’t have any say in the matter, and once empowered by the fantastic windfall that ensued, they wanted to redress the situation. The City bankers had foreseen this, and in wanting to police the area, had created the Empire of Iran in 1941 and the State of Israel in 1948. However, they made a big mistake in not paying attention to the fact that Islam was divided into two deadly enemy factions.

Since close to 90% of the 1, 5 billion Muslims in the world are Sunnis and the rest Shiites, Saudi Arabia and Egypt being the two main countries in the Sunni world, we could wonder why the City bankers opted for a Shiite Iran. In 1941, when the City decided to enthrone the Shah of Iran and give him state of the art armament, it seems the City was swayed by the fact that ex-Persia represented one of the greatest cultures that the world had ever seen, and that the sheiks of the peninsula were perceived as mere tribal chiefs.

Since 1694, the City bankers have made three major mistakes. The first was when the original Bank of England bankers forced English trade down everybody’s throats which ended up costing them America and the financial control of the world. The second was when the banking dynasty that replaced it put too much trust in Tsar Nicholas II which led to WWII, and the third was when that same dynasty failed to pay attention to the Shiite-Sunni split which ended up costing them the Six-Day War, the Iran-Iraq War and the two Gulf Wars, not to mention all the ongoing terrorist acts that have to be countered on a daily basis.

The City bankers did, however, change their minds after Israel defeated Sunni Egypt in the Six-Day War in 1967, when it became obvious that the Shah of Iran was not able to hold his end of the bargain and assert his authority in the Middle East. In 1979, the bankers decided to back the Sunnis (Saudi Arabia and Egypt) instead of the Shiites (Iran). They had the Ayatollah Khomeini depose the Shah of Iran on the one hand and encouraged Saudi Arabia to back Saddam Hussein and make him the strong man in Iraq on the other.

The Iraq-Iran War followed in 1980, and it turned out to be a long war of attrition that ended in a stalemate. Not only was Saddam Hussein an incapable leader unable to defeat the Shiites of Iran, but he was becoming an unmanageable despot. He therefore had to go, and it took two Gulf Wars to get rid of him, one in 1990 and another in 2003. A media campaign was sufficient to get America to launch the 1st Iraq War codenamed Desert Storm in 1990, but the negative results of that war that had followed the apocalyptic Vietnam War made Americans wary, and it took the World Trade Center bombing of 1993, the Oklahoma Federal Building bombing of 1995, and 9/11 in 2001 to get America to launch the 2nd Iraq War in 2003. Today, Saddam is gone, the Sunnis (Saudi Arabia) are slowly reasserting their authority in the region, while the City is encouraging a Muslim diaspora in order to have Islam integrate the global village. By having millions of Muslims immigrate to a Europe that badly needs manpower, Islam will gradually be liberated from the sheiks’ influence and become an acceptable religion just like in the case of Christianity after the Holy Roman Empire was destroyed.

For now, the recalcitrant Sunnis and Shiites are spreading terror in order to have their way, and there is a lot of collateral damage whereby innocent people suffer. But the good news is that the Sunni and Shiite leaders will be forced to throw in the towel in the not too distant future because the global village concept is irreversible. Some Emirates have already started adopting western ways, and it’s only a matter of time before their leaders start wearing ‘suits’.

49-GEOPOLITICAL SANDWICH

 

WWII had been needed because, during WWI, when the tsar left to take command of the armies, the Bolsheviks in the Duma and the tsarina with her spiritual adviser Rasputin all opposed the war on the one hand, and the tsar was not meant to be a military field commander on the other. The bankers in the City had not expected such a development, and since an eastern front wasn’t materializing, they had no choice but to terminate a war that had become a senseless war of attrition. The City bankers decided that if Russia was to be counted on to create an eastern front in the upcoming WWII, and eventually play a scarecrow role in what was to be the mighty USSR after the war, they needed a new strongman at the helm. By 1928 Stalin had replaced Lenin and introduced his five-year plan.

In 1929, Stalin ordered the liquidation of the Kulaks as a social class, and the Red Purges lasted until 1938. In 1922, Lenin had introduced an economic plan that allowed some farmers to sell their crops. Once in power, Stalin completely did away with all that, and millions of Kulaks with their families starved or were slaughtered. According to this egomaniac, for the USSR to catch up with the world, everybody had to work for the state, no questions asked. Naturally, the USSR was transformed into the formidable police state that many of us later came to know, but at the exorbitant cost of 20 million Russian civilians and soldiers killed.

By 1945, all the old regimes of Europe had been dismantled and the Holy Roman Empire east of the Rhine no longer existed. The pound sterling had been replaced by the dollar as the international reserve currency, Germany and Japan were completely devastated, and China was unified. Moreover, Israel, which was destined to become the gendarme of the Middle East, was on the verge of becoming a state. The hordes of Jews from Eastern Europe hell-bent on reaching America before the war had been pushed back under atrocious conditions and forced to work for the German war machine before being transported from the Baltic states to Palestine at the end of the war.

Prior to WWII, Russia had been merely a shell of a nation. But thanks to the American lend-lease program, the City bankers had armed the nation and Russia had ‘won’ the war. After the war, the lend-lease program continued and Russia was transformed into a virtual superpower, the USSR, a country that would be perceived as a worthy U.S. foe. The world would henceforth have two major league teams: the U.S. would be team ‘A’, and the USSR, team ‘B’. They were to threaten each other in order to create international tension, but they were never meant to shoot at each other, and never did. Both teams did the bidding of the bankers in the City, and if there’s any doubt, all we have to do is look at the role the USSR played in Afghanistan, Egypt, Algeria, Cuba, and other parts of the world before it collapsed like a house of cards. However, the main purpose for having these two teams after the war was to create a monster geopolitical sandwich, a sandwich with Europe in the middle of two bigger-than-life military powers, the U.S. and the USSR. Having lost its will to fight after two world wars, and being constantly threatened with nuclear annihilation, Europe would naturally be eager to unite and protect itself against those two big bullies. As planned, the cold war did not see a single shot fired between the two “superpowers,” and the Treaty of Maastricht was signed at about the same time the Berlin Wall was torn down in 1989.

Russia was a huge, bankrupt country that had always known a feudal serf system. It had been a nation with no market economy, no infrastructure, and its citizens didn’t even have indoor plumbing, yet lo and behold, underdeveloped Russia miraculously became a superpower overnight, and took off for the stars. In no time at all, it had rockets and Sputniks, nuclear bombs and missiles, and it was threatening to blow up the whole world. Intercontinental bombers and nuclear submarines were being built in record number and in record time, or so the Gorgon Sisters told us. The City was obviously building the most impressive scarecrow it could dream up as fast as it could. Russia’s MIGS were even equipped with Rolls-Royce engines from England. Russia had a lot of missiles, but we’ll never know how many of them were equipped with nuclear warheads. The City was erecting an imaginary apocalyptic structure that would be so threatening and so ever-present in people’s minds, especially now that there was a television set in everybody’s living room, that it would sow terror in the heart of the citizens of the world. Russia became a phenomenal scarecrow that was used in a masterful propaganda campaign that lasted forty-odd years.

The City had set up the Russian scarecrow for everyone to see. It financed the Sputnik project in 1957 and stuffed the ensuing images in all the television sets in America and the world, thereby turning the USSR into a bigger-than-life foe. When the Berlin Wall was built in 1961, and especially when Nikita Khrushchev allegedly gave atomic bomb carrying missiles to Cuba in 1962, the USSR was perceived as the baddest superpower the world could imagine.

As expected, with the U.S. on one side and the USSR on the other, the Europeans were quick to start talking union. As early as 1950, Germany and France decided to unite their steel and coal industries, and in 1957, the same year Sputnik was launched, the Treaty of Rome was signed and the European Economic Union, the EEC, was born. The Berlin Wall fell in 1989 and the Treaty of Maastricht was signed in 1992. Now that the European Union had reached the point of no return, the wall was no longer needed. It was demolished while Russia went back to being the feudal serf regime that it had always been. At the time, many wondered about the USSR being little more than smoke and mirrors, but the Gorgon Sisters kept the image alive as best they could. The propaganda techniques used in the case of the USSR scarecrow were so efficient and cost-effective that the City is today successfully using the same technique in North Korea, albeit for other reasons.

If the geopolitical U.S.A.-Europe-USSR sandwich theory seems far-fetched, circumstantial evidence can be had from Louis T. McFadden’s infamous report to Congress in November 1934. McFadden was a respected Congressman who had started as a humble bank clerk and had become President of the Pennsylvania Bankers’ Association before being elected as a Republican Representative to the sixty-fourth Congress in 1914. Congressman Louis T. McFadden was Chairman of the very prestigious House Committee on Banking and Currency from 1920 to 1931. Nonetheless, this extraordinary citizen was accused of being an anti-Semite because he fought the FED.

When he accused the FED of having caused the Great Depression, and also of having funded the Bolshevik Revolution, it was taken very seriously in the City. It got worse when, in 1932, he moved to impeach President Hoover while bringing conspiracy charges against the FED, and when again in 1933, he moved to impeach the Secretary of the Treasury, two assistant Secretaries of the Treasury and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, as well as the officers and directors of the FED’s twelve regional banks. His attempts failed, but there were subsequently three attempts on his life. The third one was successful when he died of poisoning on a visit to New York City, in 1936. No order is ever given for drastic action of this kind, but there is always an appropriately placed ‘suit’ to do what ‘needs’ to be done.

The City cannot exist without democracy, and democracy cannot exist without the empowerment of the people, therefore, the City bankers are sometimes forced to play with life and death like a heart surgeon. Taking a healthy heart from a dead person, and a sick one from a live person, and switching them, is not something too many people can do. And while the results are not always those hoped for, who can say with any degree of certainty if it’s not warranted? The only things that matter in drastic world undertakings such as war is for its motive to be dispassionate and for the goal to be for the good of all, at least in the long term. After two world wars, there was Bretton Woods, and since then, the world is officially under one financial roof. If we believe that, as we should, we also believe that the City bankers can’t possibly want to destroy the superb structure that took them 400 years to build. We can be absolutely sure there will never be another major war, that is, unless it’s launched from outer space.

 

48-THE STATE OF ISRAEL

There’s quite a dilemma here! Either the Rothschilds control world finance or they don’t. If they control international finance since 1810, why didn’t they put a stop to the Nazi Party’s rise and the arms buildup prior to WW11, and the horrendous persecution of the Jews during the war? The answer is that they were the ones who financed all three operations. Let’s not forget that the Rothschilds control the three Gorgon sisters that can launch propaganda campaigns at will. Why should we be surprised if, in matters surrounding WWII, the media didn’t tell it like it was? The following is a synopsis of the Jewish question and why the City allowed so many atrocities to be committed against the Jews.

First, the three Gorgon sisters exaggerated the numbers when they said that six million Jews were exterminated during WWII while spreading horrendous pictures to support their claim. One of the reasons they did was because the Rothschilds wanted to create the State of Israel, and to do so, they had to shock the conscience of the Christian world that is anti-semite. So, at the end of the war, not only did they exploit the pictures that were taken of 42,000 Bergen-Belsen camp prisoners who had died of typhus and had been bulldozed into mass graves, and those of the many thousands of emaciated prisoners dying of starvation in the many liberated camps after the war, but they distorted the truth by alleging they were all Jews. What is not made clear is that Roms, homosexuals, misfits, intellectuals, politicians and prisoners of war made up a large portion of the camp populations. The Rothschilds wanted to transfix the whole human race with deeply-felt horror using appalling pictures in order to lay the groundwork for the creation of the State of Israel while guaranteeing that their name would never be associated with WWII, for how could anybody in his right mind think the Rothschilds had anything to do with WWII, a war that was meant to exterminate Jews?

However, what happened to the Jews in Europe during WWII had to be okayed by the Rothschilds, for it was the culmination of a very complex Jewish problem that had been created by the Rothschilds themselves. As early as 1892, the Russian Jews, who had been forever persecuted, were used as pawns when the Rothschilds decided to encourage them to go to Palestine with the intention of creating a homeland for all the Jews of the world, a state that would play the role of a much needed policeman in the oil-rich Middle East. They started financing Jewish immigration to what was to become Israel, in 1892. Up until 1939, there were five waves of immigration, population movements better known as Aliyahs. The last Aliyah occurred just before WWII when approximately 250,000 Jews left Germany and Central and Eastern Europe for Palestine. The Aliyahs were partially successful, and Tel-Aviv, founded in 1909, attests to that. However, Palestine was a very arid place and as disillusioned Jews wandered back into Europe, they spread the word that Palestine was not a very inviting land. It’s also a known fact that most of the Jews wanted to reach the West. They all wanted to go to America in spite of the fact that the U.S. had, by now, removed the welcome mat. One thing was for sure, Palestine was not a place where the East European Jews wanted to go and they would have to be forced into going if the Jewish homeland was to become a reality.

Since early Russian persecutions against Jews, many of the latter had ended up in Poland, a land of tolerant Catholics who had welcomed the poor lost souls. But prior to WWI, many Jews bent on going west to America, headed westward and landed in Germany where they were exploited and, in many cases, used as slave labor in the German factories that were gearing up for the war. After losing the war, an impoverished Germany wanted to rid itself of the same poor uneducated Polish Jews, for they were no longer needed and were an impediment to the economy. Unfortunately, by this time, not only did America and Germany not want them, but Poland, now run by fascist Catholics, was also refusing to take them back and had even started persecuting those that were in Poland. So, at the end of the day, millions of Jews who had been encouraged to go to Palestine by the Rothschilds were now stagnating in the worst of conditions in Central Europe.

Necessarily, the Jewish problem was front-and-center during the planning of WWII and it is no accident that the City chose to finance the Thule Society, a group of Nazis who believed in a superior Aryan race and who blamed the Jews for Germany’s woes. If the City wanted to force the Jews eastward, spirit them northward and later, out of Europe, it was better to finance those who would do a convincing job and who would never be associated with the Rothschild name. In a critical situation, it is better to deal with the devil you know than the one you don’t.

The Rothschilds had obviously accepted the fact that during the upcoming WWII, no matter what they did, the Jews would greatly suffer along with the Germans, the Russians, and the Poles, and they likely decided to make the best out of this calamitous enterprise by managing it as best they could. If, after the war, many of the Nazi “war criminals” were allowed to live in peace in such places as Brazil, Argentina, and Canada, it can only mean they had rendered great services to the City bankers during the war and were now being protected by their very powerful guardian angel.

All the alleged extermination camps were built in Eastern Europe, mainly in Poland. The City had started building this extravagant network of camps and railways before the fall of Warsaw in 1939. Was the fact that they were all built behind what was to become the Iron Curtain and would be inaccessible to Western scrutiny for the next forty years due to fate, or was it planned? Collective memory is very short and with the Russian scarecrow already in the works, the City no doubt knew that if its “final solution” propaganda was not physically challenged during the Cold War, it would remain unassailable for eternity. Whatever, there doesn’t seem to be much doubt that the plan was to have the German “war criminals” round up as many Jews as possible and send them eastward to the Polish camps before sending them northward to the labor camps in German occupied territories. After a sure-to-be-horrendous treatment, the poor wretches who survived would welcome the opportunity to go to Palestine and, with a world trembling with revulsion, Israel would become a reality.

The number of Polish Jews who were or were not killed in the conditions we were told is today a much-contested matter. There are two groups with opposing views: the revisionists and the proponents. The history of WWII tells us that six million Jews were exterminated by the Germans in what is called the Holocaust. That seems to be what the Rothschilds have always wanted the world to believe and the three Gorgon Sisters were very successful in doing just that. However, the forensic evidence emanating from revisionists and published since the end of the war, indicates that there was no systematic extermination of the Jews, and certainly nothing close to the six million that were officially declared massacred.

The proponents, on the other hand, contend there were mass graves in extermination camps such as Treblinka and Auschwitz, graves that allegedly contained the ashes of millions of cremated bodies. If so, such numbers would have produced hundreds of tons of ashes, along with bone and tooth debris, and the lot would be extremely easy to detect. Ground penetrating radars can easily show where mass graves are dug, even seventy years after the fact. Proving their existence would be a simple matter of going to the alleged areas, grabbing a shovel, taking a few samples, and analyzing their contents in the presence of an impartial team of observers. The matter could thus be laid to rest in the matter of hours and yet the proponents have never agreed to do this.

The revisionists, on the other hand, did conduct clandestine experiments where the alleged mass graves allegedly were and found nothing to support the proponents’ thesis. Furthermore, a respected scientist, Germar Rudolph, experimented with the alleged gas chambers in Poland and concluded that no such mass extermination methods were used. Fred Leuchter, an engineer who was in the business of building gas execution chambers in the U.S., clearly demonstrated that Zyclon-B gas, an insecticide that was allegedly used in the alleged extermination camps, had been tested in the U.S. as a possible lethal gas for executions as early as 1929, and that, based on his experience and that of his predecessors, it could have been used to disinfect clothing, but not to kill large numbers of people if used in conditions such as existed in the alleged WWII gas chambers.

It seems the number of Jewish victims was greatly exaggerated, that there were no mass exterminations, and that the strip-gas-incinerate horror stories were more of the strip-shower-delouse variety. To be sure, there were many executions and mobile gassing units were used, but nothing that would account for the death of millions. Before WWII, there were three million Jews in Poland. We know that thirty-five thousand died in the Warsaw Ghetto and that some three hundred thousand were sent on to Treblinka, but the proponents say that the whole three million were exterminated. It’s much more likely that most of the three million Polish Jews were forced northward and used in labor camps for the German arms industry. If the proponents keep proposing this preposterous figure as a starting number, they, of course, soon arrive at the six million number put forward by the three Gorgon sisters. However, based on good common sense, the total number of Jews who were murdered or gassed, and who died of starvation and disease, had to be much less. The proponents, in justifying the six million figures, likely ignore the fact that four point four million Jews left Europe between 1931 and 1945.

To be sure, the numbers used by the three Gorgon sisters after the war were very misleading. For instance, of the seventy thousand Jews deported from France during the war, only around seven thousand were full-fledged registered French citizens and of those, three thousand returned after the war. In Germany, it was even more blurred, for there was a large population of poor Polish Jews that were unregistered. Of the 140 thousand Jews deported to Poland, we can’t know how many were German citizens, but we do know that after the war, some fifteen thousand German Jews along with some 200 thousand East European Jews came back to settle in Allied-occupied Germany. In France, as in Germany, non-nationals were never part of the census and a lot of Jews had been running for their lives. It should be noted, as well, that a lot of those who were exterminated were the very rich. The local French or German nomenklatura no doubt knew a good thing when they saw one, and it is no accident if much of the wealth stolen from the rich French and German Jews ended up in Swiss banks while their owners were exterminated. It may all be a muddle, but could it be there were a lot more survivors than believed and that the horrific Jew round-up throughout Europe was a “resettlement solution” to the very complex problem created by the Rothschilds, who had failed in their attempt to send East European Jews to Palestine years before?

There is no proof that millions were exterminated and buried at Treblinka, Auschwitz, or other such sites during the war. This does not take away from the fact that German psychopaths caused the death of many Jews and the suffering of millions more. It just means that many of the victimized Jews were saved because they were transited through such camps as Treblinka and Auschwitz on their way to the labor camps in the Baltic States and Sweden, and after the war, were shipped to Palestine. Schindler’s List is much, much, longer than we think.

We mustn’t forget that, during WWII, the Eastern front was a deadly place to be, for it claimed twenty million Russians and eight million Germans. During that period, Germans imprisoned and executed Roms, homosexuals, misfits and reactionaries, and prisoners of all kinds, not just Jews. A great number of Jews died in unspeakable ways, but could the word extermination used to describe their fate be a bit too strong? Could the expression “final solution” have been misused in that it was intended to mean that the State of Israel would finally be created and that no Jew would ever again be persecuted?

Some may wonder why scientists who question the existence of mass graves or the use of gas chambers for mass extermination during WWII are accused of inciting hatred toward Jews. Why are people who want to know the truth convicted and even imprisoned? That is very odd behavior indeed on the part of democratic states. Could this be more proof that democracies around the world are totally controlled by the City? If the Jewish bankers find it necessary to prevent forensic research into these matters by jailing scientists, is it because their backs are against the wall? The City is made up of hard-nosed pragmatists and, when doing business, they don’t make mistakes like leaving physical evidence lying about or not leaving any when they say they did. Could it be that this time, in their efforts to create the State of Israel, they were a bit careless because they were being ruled by their emotions like the Church prelates of old? Could it be they depended too much on permanent collective amnesia?

No matter, when the State of Israel was created, the Rothschilds had reached one of their main objectives and it is almost certain that an anti-Semite world would not have been as easily won over if the pictures taken at the end of the war hadn’t been used so effectively, and if the six million figure hadn’t been etched in people’s brains. Repeating the word “genocide” and broadcasting that six million Jews had been exterminated, while showing emaciated bodies being bulldozed into huge trenches, definitely had more impact than simply acknowledging the horrific death of a great number of Jews. Why else are the six million figures so sacred? Surely, the appalling death of so many and the horrendous treatment endured by millions more is bad enough.